Wooble wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The only instances involving the AFO were subject to "out-of-court" >> settlements before a precedent was set. > > By the way, I think the AFO clearly does devolve its obligations onto > its members, but in such a way that, since the passage of "Take it to > Equity", the members are simply in violation of the contract if they > don't cause the AFO to obey the rules of Agora to the maximum possible > extent, and it's impossible to punish them for such violations. It > seems to me that the wording of the contract is sufficient to make the > AFO a person, but not sufficient to actually compel members to do > anything.
Note that this only became a problem with "Take it to equity!" was adopted; before that, you could go straight to criminal prosecution of the members for failing to keep the AFO obedient.
