On 13:19 Sat 09 Aug     , Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2053
> 
> =========================  Criminal Case 2053  =========================
> 
>     ehird violated rule 2149 by lying.
> 
> ========================================================================
> 
> Caller:                                 tusho
> 
> Judge:                                  OscarMeyr
> Judgement:                              INNOCENT
> 
> Appeal:                                 2053a
> Decision:                               REMAND
> 
> Judge:                                  pikhq
> Judgement:
> 
> ========================================================================
> 
> History:
> 
> Called by tusho:                        30 Jun 2008 00:10:38 GMT
> Defendant tusho informed:               01 Jul 2008 21:40:34 GMT
> Pre-trial phase ended:                  08 Jul 2008 21:40:34 GMT
> Assigned to OscarMeyr:                  12 Jul 2008 15:25:22 GMT
> Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr:           13 Jul 2008 15:56:01 GMT
> Appealed by Taral:                      13 Jul 2008 16:53:50 GMT
> Appealed by Zefram:                     13 Jul 2008 19:06:02 GMT
> Appealed by Wooble:                     13 Jul 2008 19:19:57 GMT
> Appeal 2053a:                           13 Jul 2008 22:46:32 GMT
> REMANDED on Appeal:                     21 Jul 2008 16:49:05 GMT
> Remanded to OscarMeyr:                  21 Jul 2008 16:49:05 GMT
> OscarMeyr recused:                      03 Aug 2008 13:16:22 GMT
> Assigned to ais523:                     09 Aug 2008 14:31:13 GMT
> ais523 recused:                         09 Aug 2008 16:36:56 GMT
> Assigned to pikhq:                      (as of this message)
> 
> ========================================================================
> 
> Caller's Arguments:
> 
> I inititae a criminal CFJ against myself for lying (rule 2149), blah
> blah blah see above.
> 
> ========================================================================
> 
> Gratuitous Arguments by tusho:
> 
> I did not state "I am registered". I stated "I register". An action failing
> is not illegal.
> 
> ========================================================================
> 
> Judge OscarMeyr's Arguments:
> 
> In the message in question, Defendant stated:  "I join" and not "I am
> registered."  As e argued, a failed action is not a false statement.
> I therefore rule INNOCENT.
> 
> ========================================================================
> 
> Gratuitous Arguments by Taral:
> 
> Wait, didn't CFJ 2048 cover this one? If it's the same action, 2053
> should be ALREADY TRIED.
> 
> ========================================================================

CFJ 2048 has judged ehird guilty, but has not gotten around to sentencing yet. 
ALREADY TRIED.

Reply via email to