2008/8/6 Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:30, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > In an equity case, this sort of word-twisting is not appropriate, if >> > the Nethack sense of "ascend" was understood to be the relevant term >> > in the spirit of the contract and the eyes of the parties. -Goethe >> >> On the other hand, I find it hard to imagine how the plaintiff was >> harmed with respect to equity by the respondent's failure to abide by >> eir pledge. > > I think it would be reasonable to assign the null judgment unless the > plantiff explains this.
It offended my deepest sensibilities. Also, my religion, Ivanhopenethackascendagoracontractian...
