On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:24 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:26 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> What about PerlNomic? Shouldn't that be recognised too? After all, it's
> >>> participating in Agora at the moment...
> >> Having a forum in PerlNomic in which e could announce the recognition
> >> would probably be a first good step...
> >
> > Well, in that case Agora's recognition system discriminates against
> > non-forum-based nomics. Besides, there's chuck.DISCUSSION.discussion
> > (IIRC), which does work as a discussion forum, it's just not accessible
> > to non-players and seems to have broken some time while the server was
> > down.
>
> Any active nomic has to use some form of group communication, which can
> reasonably be designated a forum.
>
Mostly we communicate in the text of proposals, and occasionally in
comments on them. I can certainly imagine that a proposal of the form
"Nothing except speech acts may be posted to Public Forums, and players
may not discuss the game except in Public Forums" would not denomicise
Agora, although it would make it very different.
--
ais523
