comex wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5667 O1 1.9 BobTHJ Some players are more equal than others
>> FOR*(lambda m:...
>
> Since ehird insists that \x03 doesn't count...
>
> I retract this vote and vote FOR*(lambda m:(lambda c:(lambda
> f:f(f,0,0,[0]*1000))(lambda
> f,n,p,a:(('',a,n)) if p>=len(c) else ((lambda dc:dc[c[p]]() if c[p] in
> dc.keys() else
> f(f,n,p+1,a))({43:lambda:f(f,n,p+1,a[:n]+[(a[n]+1)%256]+a[n+1:]),45:lambda:f(f,n,p+1,a[:n]+[(a[n]-1)%256]+a[n+1:]),62:lambda:f(f,n+1,p+1,a),60:lambda:f(f,n-1,p+1,a),46:lambda:(lambda
> v:(chr(a[n])+v[0],v[1],v[2]))(f(f,n,p+1,a)),91:lambda:(f(f,n,((lambda
> g:g(g,p+1,1)) (lambda f,n,p:n if p==0 else f(f,n+1,p+1) if c[n]==91
> else f(f,n+1,p-1) if c[n]==93 else f(f,n+1,p))),a)) if a[n]==0 else
> ((lambda v:(lambda w:(v[0]+w[0],w[1],w[2]))(f(f,v[2],p,v[1])))
> (f(f,n,p+1,a))),93:lambda:('',a,n)})))[0])([ord(i) for i in
> m]))('+++++++[->+++++++<]>++.')
This, when evaluated in Python 2.5, prints '3'.
And now I understand what '+++.' in the previous version was
getting at. Dear God, you should be taken out and shot. :)
