On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:10 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's rule 2125 I'm trying to invoke there, which is not a SHOULD at all. > You're thinking of the wrong rule...
I was thinking of the judge's reasoning guiding play, which is a SHOULD, but if your reasoning constitutes "a judicial finding" you may be right. Of course, we all still have the privilege of objecting granted by R101(i); our R101(ii) right to do so was immaterial all along.
