On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:05 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gratuitous arguments, just in case nobody else has already said this > (maybe I have and then forgotten): If somebody states "I CFJ on this > statement", they're taking the action "I CFJ on this statement" not > because they're CFJing on it, but because they're stating it. You > never stated "I transfer all my crops to the PNP".
I was thinking along the same lines, and would have already issued a ruling of FALSE had the initiator not specifically requested the judge's reasoning to include a look at lots of different issues. Of course, I'm under no obligation to honor that request, but I'd rather put off judging until I have the time to consider all of the issues rather than invite an appeal.
