On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:22, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/7/22 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> tusho wrote: >> >>> The following action will fail: I initiate a criminal CFJ against tusho for >>> violating rule 2149 by stating that the initiation of this criminal CFJ will >>> fail. >> >> I'm treating this as not clearly expressing intent to initiate a CFJ. >> >> > > I'm not. The statement that it will fail is seperate from the initiation. > > The initiation is clearly specified.
I think that was a hint to make an inquiry CFJ on it if you disagreed. -woggle
