On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:58 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:15 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I object to every dependent action I can object to. I support every >> dependent action I can support. > > I'm treating this as ineffective by the precedent of CFJ 1307.
The judgement on CFJ 1307 hinges mainly on how the rule on Notices of Transfer provided a special requirement by stating that the currencies to be transferred must be "specified", which was not adequately satisfied by saying "everything I own". Rule 2124, "Agoran Satisfaction", provides no such requirement, as it doesn't say "specify" or any such thing: "A Supporter of a dependent action is a first-class player who has publicly posted (and not withdrawn) support for an announcement of intent to perform the action. An Objector to a dependent action is a first-class player (or other person explicitly allowed to object to that action by the rule allowing that action to be performed dependently) who has publicly posted (and not withdrawn) an objection to the announcement of intent to perform the action." Therefore, the precedent of CFJ 1307 does not apply here. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
