On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:03 AM, comex wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
========================= Criminal Case 2088
=========================
tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting.
====================================================================
====
I am willing to rule UNIMPUGNED if tusho will kindly provide
evidence of a
capability to dance from a seated position.
B-but--- by CFJ 1881, tusho is not a Marvy, and so need not Dance a
Powerful Dance!
Good catch, thank you.
Once again, I'm caught in the unimpugned / innocent conundrum.
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
