Kerim Aydin wrote: > For the rules to define a class of assets to be a card, the > Rules must define its Title, its House, and its Exploit.
I think you mean that the *assets* are cards, not that the *class* is a card. I expect the Title, House, and Exploit are attributes of the class, rather than individual assets/cards; better make that clear. > Cards are tracked by the Herald. Bad overloading. Create the office of dealor. > any such attempted transfer is prima facie > assumed to occur. This is garbled. Our ordinary standards of evidence would say that an announcement of a transfer is prima facie evidence that the transfer occurred. If you want a stronger effect than that, you need to be more explicit: perhaps an announcement of transfer is a self-ratifying report that the recipient received the card. > House may be one of Major or Minor, and the collection of all > cards in a house may be referred to as the Major and Minor > Arcana, respectively. Er, what? How many houses are there? Is a house, in fact, an entity in its own right, or is "house" just the label for a class of switch? > Herald SHALL chose the card to be dealt randomly from among "choose". > The holder of a major Arcana > SHOULD also, in general, be treated as if e holds a legal > position in Agora equivalent to the title of the card. I find this phrasing a bit unclear. Seeing the rule defining the major arcana clarified it, but then I think it's a bad idea. The card and the position should have distinct names. > the announcement, e SHALL return all Major Arcana to the > deck CAN e? >Repeal Rule 402. You'll have to repeal rule 103 as well to make the speakership behave as a card. -zefram
