On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/7/17 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Judicial corruption at its finest. Why have a reasonable argument when >> we can simply push this through by sheer force alone? >> >> BobTHJ >> > > Exactly my thoughts when I responded last night. Sgeo, you've whined in > ##nomic for ages about how much you're doooomed if certain CFJs get judged > in a certain way but you can't always have it like you want and appeals are > not > to be used because you dislike the outcome. >
Sure they are (you are a member of the Protection Racket, remember?). Although in this case it seems CotC Murphy out-foxed the CFJ 2065 winners crowd by assigning a Judicial Panel containing a majority of opposed judges. BobTHJ BobTHJ
