On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> The initiator is unqualified to be assigned as judge of the >>>> case, and in the initiating announcement e CAN disqualify one >>>> person from assignment as judge of the case. If the initiator is >>>> a partnership, all members of that partnership are unqualified >>>> to be assigned as judge of the case. >>> >>> Partnerships can't initiate inquiry cases. >> >> Rule 591 is only power 1.7; partnerships have an R101 right to initiate >> cases. > > We discussed this ages ago; my recollection is we determined their > R101 right was preserved by the ability of members of their bases to > initiate cases for them.
Of course, I can't seem to find that discussion now. -root
