On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > I support this. The precedent from CFJ 1738 is that speech acts do > carry truth values. Additionally, I know of no precedent stating what > Taral claims. > > The action having received two support, I hereby appeal CFJ 2048. Um, did you just attempt to act on someone else's intent of action? That there's criminal, that is. -Goethe
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2048 judged UNIMPUGNED by T... Taral
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2048 judged UNIMPU... Zefram
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2048 judged UNIMPUGNED... Kerim Aydin