On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 13:25 -0700, Taral wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing this text:
> >
> > * UNIMPUGNED, appropriate if the alleged act was not proscribed
> > by the specified rule at the time it allegedly occurred
> >
> > with this text:
> >
> > * UNIMPUGNED, appropriate if the alleged act would not have
> > violated the specified rule
>
> Eh?
comex got out of being found guilty in a criminal case by alleging that
the act occurred a long time ago, even though it didn't (with
appropriate disclaimers), thus forcing an OVERLOOKED version. The same
trick could be used to force a judgement of UNIMPUGNED if the act in
question had not always been illegal.
--
ais523
