On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:19 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 12:15 -0700, Dice server wrote:
>> 19
> I submit the following proposal (AI=1, II=0, Title="Exilous
> Monsteredicts", based on rule 2144):
> {{{{
> Append the following to the rule entitled "The Monster":
> {{{
> Whenever a Monsteredict of GUILTY is assigned in a criminal case
> alleging that a partnership has violated this rule, the Monster SHOULD
> assign an EXILE Monsteredict to the question on sentencing in that case.
> }}}
> }}}}
>
Not Monsterment?
