On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:42 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If a proposal is Democratic I vote FOR it.
>>> If a proposal is written by me I vote FORx5 on it.
>>> if a proposal does not fit into the above two categories I vote SPLIT
>>> DECISION on it.
>>>
>>> SPLIT DECISION should be evaluated as follows:
>>> ---
>>> for (int i = 0; i < myevlod/2; i ++)
>>> {
>>> vote FOR;
>>> vote AGAINST;
>>> }
>>> vote PRESENT;
>> H. Assessor root, if I were you, I would reject this definition as too
>> complicated, especially considering that none of the votes are
>> conditional and Quazie might have without too much effort cast them
>> explicitly.
>
> It seems clear enough too me.
>
> -root
>
I'm glad, I didn't intend to do anything that spectacular, just
something more interesting than PRESENT, with the same net effect.
