On Sunday 13 July 2008 03:26:01 pm ais523 wrote:
> Clearly, I would only initiate a criminal CFJ against myself if I
> had in fact committed the crime in question; therefore, I intended
> to initiate the criminal CFJ if and only if my attempt to initiate
> the CFJ did not fail, like I claimed, i.e. I intended to initiate
> the CFJ if and only if I initiated the CFJ.
>
> Oh, and this little bit of confusion is designed as an exercise to
> show the absurdity of finding speech acts to be lying.

Note that R2149 requires not only that you not believe your statement
to be false, but that you believe it to be true. Deliberately
ambiguous or paradoxical statements are punishable under Agoran
perjury law.

Reply via email to