2008/7/10 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This doesn't seem to require that the supporters or objectors of an > amendment to this contract be parties to this contract. >
Correct
- DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject) Sgeo
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject) Elliott Hird
2008/7/10 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This doesn't seem to require that the supporters or objectors of an > amendment to this contract be parties to this contract. >
Correct