On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I'm not sure how "obtaining" a person under "controlled conditions" squares >> us with human rights :P. It would have to be a language some percentage >> of current officers would understand (e.g. Turkish is Right Out by CFJ 1460 >> or I'd have a candidate or two). But a person whom one of us knows, without >> enough English to be called "understanding", but willing to post in eir >> language to prove e understands what e's doing (CFJ 1856)? Tricky. > > Yes. It'd be nice if people posted what languages they know well enough to > converse with someone. Then we need to find a person knowing that language > and not English, try and explain the situation, and ask them to post > what's required.
If by "explain the situation" you mean "translate the whole ruleset to avoid CFJ 1856" then I agree with you that this would work (this is why I said in the first place it would never happen). -G.