On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/7/8 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I'm not sure how "obtaining" a person under "controlled conditions" squares
>> us with human rights :P.  It would have to be a language some percentage
>> of current officers would understand (e.g. Turkish is Right Out by CFJ 1460
>> or I'd have a candidate or two).  But a person whom one of us knows, without
>> enough English to be called "understanding", but willing to post in eir
>> language to prove e understands what e's doing (CFJ 1856)?  Tricky.
>
> Yes. It'd be nice if people posted what languages they know well enough to
> converse with someone. Then we need to find a person knowing that language
> and not English, try and explain the situation, and ask them to post
> what's required.

If by "explain the situation" you mean "translate the whole ruleset to
avoid CFJ 1856" then I agree with you that this would work (this is why I 
said in the first place it would never happen).  -G.



Reply via email to