On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Charles Reiss wrote: > On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> ========================= Criminal Case 2048 ========================= >>> >>> ehird violated Rule 2149 by saying that e joins. >> >> As much as I appreciate Goethe's sentiment about the deception, the >> registration attempt is an action, and precedent holds that it is >> therefore merely ineffective. UNIMPUNGED. > > Could you please amend your arguments to cite this precedent?
I'm also not sure what "Goethe's sentiment" is here. I agree with Taral and the defendant. As for precedent, somewhere in the CFJ archives isn't there a case to wit "an imperative (e.g. "I do") is neither true nor false"? -Goethe
