On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Benjamin Schultz wrote: >>> Ignoring the fact that I spent my 50 VP on **nothing** (pikhq took my >>> VP, called me a fool, and left the Vote Market, no longer obligated to >>> perform the action which I paid all those VP for em to do),
comex, did you consider raising an equity case against the Vote Market in general or its author(s), alleging that the "leak" that pikhq exploited was unenvisioned by the good faith operation of the contract, it was remiss of the contract authors to leave this loophole, and thus the Vote Market should adjust its records to give you back the loss and (though I think they've done so already) alter the contract to close the loophole? -Goethe
