On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 12:25 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> At this point, I'm realizing that I'm not comfortable being in a contract
> with this kind of economic character where (1) leaving the contract is
> limited
> in many circumstances and (2) the contract change mechanism is majority vote
> instead of without X objections. It's too easy to give substantial economic
> power to 51% of the group. You're making what should be "power-2 or above"
> level changes with a majority vote.
I'd support making the contract change mechanism without-2-objections.
--
ais523
