On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It follows from this that were someone to guess the Right Hand content > referred to in the Left Hand and to become a Partner of the Left Hand > by announcement, eir act of joining would most likely fail to bind em > to the Right Hand, or at the very least give em the right, clause 7 of > the Left Hand notwithstanding, to cease to be bound by the Right Hand > (and, by clause 0, the Left Hand as well) by announcement. However, > this is probably an issue best left to the Equity courts in case this > scenario arises.
I don't see how this makes any difference whatsoever. A person entering into the agreement in this manner would either have to agree to the Right Hand, forgoing eir R101(v) right to not be considered bound by it, or else e would be agreeing to everything in the Left Hand *except* clause 0, meaning that e has really not agreed to be bound by the Left Hand at all. This again leads back to the conclusion that the two are separate components of a single agreement. -root
