On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Proposal titled "Defend Democracy!" AI>=1.5 II=? >> No agreement is allowed to force a person to vote a certain way or to >> not vote on any democratic decision. >> > I fear that this is going to be buggy no matter what you do. Imagine a > Walrus Scam-like setup where a player gets assets for voting a certain > way, and is required to gain those assets, for instance. Imagine a > setup that allows people to not vote as is required, but punishes em > for doing so. And so on. > > The only thing I can think of is to put voting freely on a democratic > decision in rule 101 as a right, and strengthen rule 101 so that that > particular right couldn't be overriden by contracts, etc.
And what fun would that be? BobTHJ
