On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote: >> Where in the rules are Gratuitous arguments described... it seems like >> it is custom and not rule. > > It is wholly custom. In fact, while R2205 says that arguments SHOULD > be presented, there's nothing to say that the CotC has to publish or > report *any* of it (I think?), including initiator's or judge's. > > -Goethe >
Hmm... maybe we should rule-ify it then, if only as a SHOULD.
