On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More specifically: The contract originally known as Teh Cltohed Mna [1] > and renamed to ehrid [2] contains an explicit list of its members, > titled the Manroster.
Actually, the contract doesn't claim the Manroster is a list of parties to ehrid. The Manroster is a list of player who can act on behalf of ehrid, but it's entirely possible for the contract to have more parties who cannot act on its behalf. As the contract is written, it's arguable whether ehird can be on the Manroster, as it's a "list of players", but it's unambiguous that even if were to be on the list e could not act on behalf of the contract, as only "players on the Manroster" can do so.
