On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5570 D1 3 BobTHJ Chambers > AGAINST, and I pledge to vote AGAINST any similar proposal in the > near future unless its II is at least 2, changing the proposal > system like that requires much more review than an AI-1 proposal, > and this pledge terminates itself at the time of the next Notary > report so I don't have to keep tracking it forever
Don't confuse Interest Index with Adoption Index. This has an AI of 3. But it is flawed anyway (as root pointed out). I'll submit a revised version. BobTHJ
