root wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:07 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> There's really no reason to have a proposal with adoption index above >>>> 3, as power 3 is enough to grant omnipotence. (Its Royal Majesty Rule >>>> 2140 says, "No entity with power below the power of this rule can . . >>>> .") >>> There's really no reason to disallow it, either. >> It's a little bit like saying that a proposal that repeals a rule also >> has a property called "Food" which has no effect whatsoever. 9.9 is an >> arbitrary limit; 3 is not. > > 9.9 is not arbitrary. It's the largest multiple of 0.1 that can be > written in tabular reports without needing to enlarge the field.
It's also large enough that we're unlikely to need to change the limit if R2140 is altered. (Power 3 granting omnipotence is relatively new.)
