Taral wrote: >On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> the contract: comex made use of a series of partnerships to rob the >> bank, which was not envisioned by the contract. > >Finally. A proper use of the equity court.
Yes, a much more interesting one than the usual "X has violated the contract". Here the terms of the contract have been followed, and it's the intent that has run into trouble. In drafting R2169 I intended this sort of use, and I've been waiting for it to happen. Uncharted territory for the Agoran courts, at last. -zefram
