On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That inserts one of the paradox escalation holes that I've just been > trying to get rid of, but I like the principle. (If a contract is set > up so that it's ambiguous or paradoxical whether it meets the > requirements, that's a Win by Paradox right there.)
Only if 3 people don't object. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown
