On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seeing what's happened to B Nomic recently (apparently almost
> everything since last December has been illegal due to
> specifying SHALL rather than SHALL and CAN),

Silly B Nomic.  But I thought they had a rule explicitly enabling ISIDTID?

> I think it's
> probably a good idea to have some way to fix Agora if things
> go really bad. So this is an attempt to write a rule which can,
> by itself and without help from other rules, get the game out
> of just about any mess.

What might this protect us from that R1698 would not?

-root

Reply via email to