On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seeing what's happened to B Nomic recently (apparently almost > everything since last December has been illegal due to > specifying SHALL rather than SHALL and CAN),
Silly B Nomic. But I thought they had a rule explicitly enabling ISIDTID? > I think it's > probably a good idea to have some way to fix Agora if things > go really bad. So this is an attempt to write a rule which can, > by itself and without help from other rules, get the game out > of just about any mess. What might this protect us from that R1698 would not? -root