On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quazie wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> BobTHJ wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> I rename land #75 to Union Train Depot >>>> Fails. A land already exists with that name. >>> I rename land #75 to The Courthouse. >>> >>> >> >> This fails as the last one didn't. > > ? >
The first attempt to change the name of land #75 was successful unless proven otherwise,. land isn't a rule defined entity, so nothing forbids lands from having the same name. As a result the second attempt to change the name of land #75 failed because no land was named land #75.
