On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/14 Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> This has interesting implications; one cannot leave, for that is an
>> action. And inaction is still "doing nothing," which is itself an
>> action. So really, if you join this contract, you cannot *help* but
>> break the terms of it.
>>
>> avpx
>>
>
> Is 'nothing' really classified as a game action...?
>
> ehird
>

It's not regulated, so therefore it might not be considered a game
action. . . But to me it still seems ambiguous.

avpx

Reply via email to