On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/14 Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> This has interesting implications; one cannot leave, for that is an >> action. And inaction is still "doing nothing," which is itself an >> action. So really, if you join this contract, you cannot *help* but >> break the terms of it. >> >> avpx >> > > Is 'nothing' really classified as a game action...? > > ehird >
It's not regulated, so therefore it might not be considered a game action. . . But to me it still seems ambiguous. avpx