On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > root wrote: > >> Now that I think about it, can filibuster, as currently written, even >> work? Couldn't setting the quorum too high to be adopted be construed >> as "preventing a proposal from taking effect", a Power-3 secured >> change per Rule 106? > > No more than defining the F/A threshold needed for adoption. The only > rules that "prevent a proposal from taking effect" (even if it's > adopted) are 106 itself and 2034.
But then securing "preventing a proposal from taking effect" is rather ineffective, if it can just be circumvented by messing with the proposal some other way instead. -root