On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
>
>> Now that I think about it, can filibuster, as currently written, even
>> work?  Couldn't setting the quorum too high to be adopted be construed
>> as "preventing a proposal from taking effect", a Power-3 secured
>> change per Rule 106?
>
> No more than defining the F/A threshold needed for adoption.  The only
> rules that "prevent a proposal from taking effect" (even if it's
> adopted) are 106 itself and 2034.

But then securing "preventing a proposal from taking effect" is rather
ineffective, if it can just be circumvented by messing with the
proposal some other way instead.

-root

Reply via email to