> ==============================  CFJ 1985  ==============================
> 
>     The first paragraph of Rule 1586 has no effect.
> 
> ========================================================================
> 
> Caller's Arguments:
> 
> How can attempts to *be* something be unsuccessful?
> 
> ========================================================================

Proto:

We can easily construct a hypothetical situation in which this
paragraph is meaningful. Suppose that rule 9990 (Power=1) reads:
{{
      The name of this rule is Foobar.
}}
and rule 9991 (also Power=1) reads:
{{
      The name of this rule is Foobar.
}}

Since rules are defined by R2141, it follows that 9990 and 9991 would
be rule-defined entities, and thus the entire text of 9991 would be
invalidated by the first paragraph of R1586.

FALSE.


Pavitra

Reply via email to