On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intend, with the consent of my fellow panelists, to cause the panel > in CFJ to publish the following message: > > We judge REASSIGN in CFJ 1966b, accepting appellant's arguments.
This should address the point that was raised that, while R1742 does not require explicit consent an the appellants note, R101 does. -root
