On 6/5/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Note that the second judgement of CFJ 1932 went unappealed because > comex got enough support, but didn't act on it. This same trend was > pointed out a few years ago wrt legislation; if you publish a proto > and then fail to follow up, other players will generally leave the > subject alone until one of them decides you've dropped the ball.]
I did this on purpose, by the way (I believe I said so in #ircnomic, even). I won't object to plugging this hole, which has been observed (I think?) since judicial reform but not actually used.
