On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (@root: it doesn't matter if two proposals have the same title, >> because a title isn't a name. It would be a violation if two proposal >> titles had the same name, but luckily titles don't have names at all, >> generally speaking) > > Er, right. I don't see why titles should be required for proposals, > though, so I'll leave my vote as is.
Actually, looking back at CFJ 1358, "title" and "name" were conflated as being the same thing in that case, and conflict was avoided only by interpreting the "title" as including the proposal's number. But the proposal at hand would create a specific definition of a proposal's title that does *not* include the ID number. So by the precedent of CFJ 1358, I stand by my original comment. -root
