On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:47 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/30/08, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I now have 2 Support; I appeal CFJ 1935. > > I call for judgement on the statement: > * If I am judged GUILTY in CFJ 1935, a sentence other than DISCHARGE > is appropriate > Arguments: > ais523 claimed that eir "punishment" of revealing my potential scam > makes me eligible to claim R101 (vii): > vii. Every person has the right to not be penalized more than > once for any single action or inaction. > > For obvious reasons I cannot say why, but revealing that particular > idea was indeed a punishment to me. Whether ais523's actions count as > my being "penalized", however, is a different question.
I hereby punish myself for every action I've ever taken and ever will take by not Going Off Alone to Partake Joyously of a Hot Dog at lunchtime today.
