On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arguments: I suspect FALSE. The contract in question defines an > Annoucement of Chaos as something which destroys all rules and then > terminates the contract.
If I remember the punctuation correctly, it was "an Announcement of Chaos, which . . ." The comma indicates that the sentence does not refer only to Announcements of Chaos which destroy all rules, but rather states that Announcements of Chaos do in fact destroy all rules. I don't know what the consequences of this are. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
