008/5/9 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You left out a rather important part of the EXCUSED clause:
>
> * EXCUSED, appropriate if the defendant could not reasonably
> avoid _breaching_ the _rules_ in a manner at least as serious as
> that alleged
>
> (Emphasis added.) Violating your religion would not be a breach of
> the rules, so the need to do so in order to avoid an actual rule
> breach would not be grounds for EXCUSED.
>
> -root
>
You left out a rather important part of the EXCUSED clause:
* EXCUSED, appropriate if the defendant could not _reasonably_
avoid breaching the rules in a manner at least as serious as
that alleged
(Emphasis added.) So, if you'd like to make it clear: you believe it
to be more reasonable to violate a religion to obey the Agoran rules
than to violate the Agoran rules to obey a religion?
ehird
