root, this is an official request under the terms of the quoted contest to award me 5 points.
--
ais523
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ian Kelly
Sent: Wed 07/05/2008 19:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BUS: RE: [CotC] CFJ 1932 assigned to ais523
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, it looks like this case is applicable now. My judgement is the
> following contract, which is a contest, and has root as contestmaster:
>
> {{{
> 1) It being entirely within the power of the initiator of CFJ 1932 to
> resolve the alleged inequity in that case, e SHALL make a reasonable
> effort to do so within a timely fashion.
>
> 2) This is a public contract.
>
> 3) This contract is a pledge if and only if it has exactly one member.
>
> 4) Any first-class player CAN join this contract by announcement. Any
> party to this contract CAN leave it by announcement, as long as that
> party has continuously been a party to this contract for the preceding
> 168 hours.
>
> 5) The founding members of this contract are the members root and
> ais523. A founding member CAN amend this paragraph to change the list
> of founding members, without objection from any founding member, or
> with the consent of all other founding members. ("Founding member"
> always has this meaning within the scope of this contract, rather than
> any meaning it might have more generally within Agora.)
>
> 6) Upon the request of a founding member, the contestmaster SHALL as
> soon as possible award points as requested up to the limit allowed by
> the rules, as long as the number of points requested is no more than the
> limit of points awardable by the rules per Agoran week divided by the
> number of founding members, as long as the requestor has not made such
> a request within the previous 168 hours. Such awards SHALL
> be made on a first-come, first-serve basis.
>
> 7) A founding member CAN amend the text of this contract with the
> agreement of all other founding members. When this occurs, any member
> who has not explicitly consented to the change is excused from the
> contract.
> }}}
>
> I believe that this is a reasonably equitable solution; all parties
> to the contact being judged on have privatly indicated that they are
> willing to be bound by it.
I agree that this is a reasonable equitable resolution of the equity
case, and I approve this judgement, thereby putting it into effect.
-root
<<winmail.dat>>
