On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:06 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following, making it a contract:
>
> {The name of this contract is Bumblebee. This contract is a pledge.
> This contract is a location. Any party to this contract can leave it
> by announcement.}
>
> I leave the contract Bumblebee. I CFJ on the statement "There is a
> contract named Bumblebee."
I believe the answer is clearly no, since "requires at least zero
parties" and "requires at least one party" resolve to "requires at
least one party" without precedence issues getting in the way. Even if
rule precedence gets in the way, the location rule is Power 1 and the
pledge rule Power 1.5. And even without that, it's not clear that this
was a public contract as is required for something to be a location...
-woggle
