On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ============================== CFJ 1922 ============================== > > Murphy has at least one bean. > > ============================== CFJ 1923 ============================== > > pikhq has a bean. > ========================================================================
Proto-judgement: It seems to me that since the "Universe 1" and "Universe A" contracts do not refer to one another, they define two distinct classes of assets that both happen to be called "beans". Note that this does not conflict with Rule 1586, since neither class of assets is defined by the rules. Murphy did not clearly indicate whether e was attempting to create Universe 1 beans or Universe A beans, so I find the attempt failed altogther, and CFJs 1922 and 1923 are both FALSE. -root
