On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:37 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ? Consider allowing acting on behalf for the purpose of fulfilling > > marker-holder's obligations? > > Good idea. Could this be automatic? It is triggered manually, after > all, and so far I seem to be getting away with it in the Bank of > Agora.
Doubtful. The rules do not grant a contract the power to make arbitrary changes to asset holdings, whether the contract happens to be the backing document for that class of assets or not. I hadn't noticed the Bank of Agora was claiming to do this, but I doubt it works there either. > > * Someone destroying credits screws over the marker/credit balance. > > Proto-solution: disallow credit destruction (they can be transferred > > away nicely enough)? > > Also makes sense. Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the problem? Somebody who destroys eir credits is only screwing emself. -root
