AI=2, II depends on how hard this thing turns out to be to get right
{{
Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) as follows:


In the first paragraph, replace 'the rules define' with 'an instrument or 
contract (hereafter its backing document) defines', and 'specify' 
with 'specifies'.

In paragraph b), replace 'exactly one' with 'at most one'.

Replace paragraph c) with the following:

      c) Exactly one recordkeepor who tracks instances of that switch.

          i) If the type of switch's backing document is an instrument,
             then the switch's recordkeepor must be an officer in order
             for the switch definition to be effective. That officer's
             report includes the value of each instance of that switch
             whose value is not its default value, or which has no
             default value.

         ii) Otherwise, the switch's recordkeepor must be a party to
             the type of switch's backing document in order for the
             switch definition to be effective. The recordkeepor SHALL
             weekly publish the value of each instance of that switch
             whose value is not its default value, or which has no
             default value.


Insert the following paragraph before the final paragraph:

      If an instance of a switch would otherwise have its default
      value, but no default value is defined for that type of switch,
      then the instance instead comes to have a random value from
      among the possible values for that type of switch.

Insert the following paragraph after the final paragraph:

      A constant switch is a type of switch defined as such by that
      type of switch's backing document. An instance of a constant
      switch CANNOT be flipped.

}}

[I have attempted, with some difficulty, to preserve the tortuous logic of 
switch law, but am still not convinced I properly understand it -- it's all I 
can do to ape the established usage. What exactly is the relationship between 
a switch, a type of switch, and an instance of a switch?

It *seems* to be: "switch" means "type of switch"; each instance of a switch 
has exactly one type; each type of switch has a variable (hopefully finite) 
whole number of instances.

But I'm not sure, and I don't see the reason behind the dual use of "switch" 
and "type of switch" to mean the same thing. Can anyone clarify?]


..watcher

Reply via email to