On 01/04/2008, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:36 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree to the following, to become a contract as soon as one other > > person agrees to it: > > I was thinking of something similar, but on a more grandiose scale-- > for proposals. But I'll join the C party-- once you dispatch with > this SHALL tomfoolery. I recommend authorizing any C'an to act on > behalf of any other C'an for the purpose of fulfuling eir > obligations... seriously.
You mean replacing with "every C'an SHALL do X" with "every C'an is obligated to do X and any C'an can act on behalf of any other C'an for the purpose of fulfulling eir obligations"? Or maybe we could replace obligations with kicking people out. On 02/04/2008, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/1/08, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A C'an may make a Contract Change to this contract with the consent of > > a majority of C'ans. A person CANNOT become a party to this contract > > if e has been a party in the preceding 14 days.} > > Nice idea, not joining with this clause in. "A C'an may make a Contract Change to this contract with a majority of C'ans; however, after this is done, any C'an has the option to cease to become a party in a timely fashion rather than continuing to follow it"? Maybe we can make it impossible to make the contract impose obligations, even. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
