On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And you'd better believe I expect R101 protections (e.g. silence=refusal).
Perhaps you'd have to give evidence that you agree to the panelist who's performing the action. But not publicly-- even a bona fide contract can be made in secret. > but if there were questions, the evidence would > certainly have to be produced. Not necessarily. Two conspiring players could mislead the courts as to the validity of a panel judgement with private consent, just as I could make a fake mail and pretend to register, and mislead Agorans as to the existence of the new player. Both are bad form, but in the first case, the judgement would be valid anyway, just as in the second, I wouldn't have actually registered anyone.
