Goethe wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Zefram wrote: >> (More of a concern with clause 14 is that it does not specify any >> *mechanism* for amending the contract, but only gives permission. >> The contract therefore probably can't be amended from within. If it is >> unamendable then my references to clause 14 in this message are actually >> wrong because the amendment that purportedly moved the self-amendment >> provision there didn't happen. In that case my references to clause 14 >> should instead be read as references to clause 18.) > > Current lead contender for Agoran Paragraph of the Year.
No kidding. As for the topic, since clause 14 doesn't use MMI capitalization, I think there's good reason to interpret this particular "may" as actually meaning CAN.
